Rusty Rueff, HRExaminer Editorial Advisory Board Contributor

Rusty Rueff, HRExaminer Editorial Advisory Board Contributor

Please welcome back Rusty Rueff to our HRExaminer Editorial Advisory Board. Rueff operates as a freelance social curator; learning, writing, speaking, coaching, consulting and volunteering at an exciting intersection of technology, arts & entertainment, talent management, and faith. Previously Rueff was the CEO of SNOCAP and prior to that was Executive Vice President of Human Resources for Electronic Arts (EA) and Vice President, International Human Resources at PepsiCo. Full Bio


Employee Satisfaction Rises: Is it Real?

by Rusty Rueff

In the recent Glassdoor Quarterly Employment Confidence Survey, job satisfaction was ironically up while pessimism about the employment market was also increasing.  After three years of the job market ‘music’ being stopped, talent holding onto the chair they have, compensation cuts not fully restored and fears of more cost-cutting, job satisfaction being up is quizzical.

How do we explain this rise and what does it mean to today’s HR Leaders?

Some of the reasons job satisfaction may be on the rise include:

  • Recent company success. As companies have recovered and benefited from record productivity numbers and strong earnings, it could be that the success of the company bleeds into job satisfaction. The aligned belief that company outlook is improving just makes it better.  Having something to celebrate is, in itself, a good thing.
  • Reinvestment in employees. Whether forced to do so or not, some companies have begun to provide compensation increases and have reinvested in employee benefits.  The past few years, specifically 2008-2010, will be remembered as the “lost years” because of the loss of jobs and compensation. The rise in employee satisfaction may be a reaction to employers committing to getting salaries back to where they were.
  • Increase in hiring: Companies are beginning to hire back a few positions, and that must feel good to the worker who has been carrying the load of two or three of their lost co-workers.  While we all adapt, the elasticity of employee productivity is not infinite and there is a breaking point.  Just recognizing this along with a few strategic add-backs can go a long way with morale and job satisfaction.

While these could all be contributing factors, I fear that there is another reason and the time-bomb continues to tick. Could it be that we are just tired of waiting for something to improve that isn’t likely to happen? Rather than go crazy waiting for Godot, are we now just settling into a new reality and accepting that this is the way it is going to be? Instead of letting frustration and defeatism become the drivers of our psyche, are we instead lowering our expectations and finding a lower gear to be satisfied with?

While this seems like a reasonable coping mechanism, can it be sustained or are we just masking the impossible to keep masked?  I call it the “talking in the shower” question.  What are we saying to ourselves in the shower?  Are we really satisfied? Or are we still asking, “why?” and “what can I do to get out of this mess?”

If you are an HR leader, you have to ask these questions and do the best you can to put yourself into the minds and hearts of your employees.  Don’t try and fool yourself that everything is okay and that your employees really are more satisfied.  The study of geo-politics shows that many times what seemed okay on the surface was an unrest and dissatisfaction that could not be kept under wraps indefinitely.

From one HR practitioner to another, let’s be sure that we are doing our jobs and digging for the underlying truth behind employee satisfaction and the real solutions to keeping and retaining top talent.  We’ve got a lot of people counting on us to do so.

 
  • http://twitter.com/outofc0ntext outofcontext

    Good points. I think it could also be that people are accepting their fate in this market a little bit. Once you realize you’re there for a while and you’re lucky to not be out of work maybe the current gig doesn’t seem so bad after all.

  • http://twitter.com/KITE_Research James Hayton

    Many years ago now, researchers from University of Minnesota (home of the most valid measure of job satisfaction over the last 100 years) noticed that not all people whose needs were satisfied at work expressed job satisfaction, and not all people whose needs were not met at work, expressed dissatisfaction. These were called ‘off quadrant cases’ because you would expect the fit/satisfied and no fit/dissatisfied cases but not the alternative combinations.

    So what? Well to understand this, scholars then explored why people were not dissatisfied when they ‘should be’. Long story short, because they perceived constraints or barriers to having a more satisfying experience at work (committed to a career choice, perceived barriers to changing jobs etc). As a result, people adjust their cognitions to match their situation, and presto chango, people who ‘should be’ unhappy tell us they are, in fact satisfied at work. If you want the cites, shoot me a message! ciao ;-)

  • http://twitter.com/KITE_Research James Hayton

    @outofcontext well put, and you wasted far fewer electrons than I!

  • Anonymous

    I think your idea of “lower gear” is now accepted norm is more on the right track, Rusty. Also, I’m never too impressed with reports on employee satisfaction numbers. Abhishek MIttel put it well in his Mumblr blog recently: Employee engagement is a “better metric and more strongly related to business outcomes.” His analysis showed managers in the top 25% for
    engagement had half the attrition rate of managers in the bottom 25%.
    But when satisfaction was used as the metric, managers in the top 25%
    had an attrition rate only 10% lower than the bottom 25% of managers.

    I cite his post and offer more reasons on why engagement is more valid and useful than satisfaction in this post: http://www.recognizethisblog.com/2011/05/why-employee-engagement/

Page 1 of 11
More in Editorial Advisory Board, HRExaminer, Rusty Rueff (474 of 841 articles)