<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looks Like Training</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrexaminer.com/looks-like-training/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrexaminer.com/looks-like-training</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:03:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DebExo</title>
		<link>http://www.hrexaminer.com/looks-like-training/comment-page-1#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>DebExo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 16:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrexaminer.com/?p=2714#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Agree that recruiting is broken and needs a fundamental rethinking ..but training? really?...I believe that training also is fundamentally flawed and needs its own rethinking. Few C-suite leaders believe their training functions are delivering on the fundamentals that drive their businesses. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many of the key outputs of HR need 21st century solutions/perspectives/processes...instead my observation is that we (that includes me) dress up the standard HR 20th century solutions with technology so it has a 21st century &quot;flavor&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree that recruiting is broken and needs a fundamental rethinking ..but training? really?&#8230;I believe that training also is fundamentally flawed and needs its own rethinking. Few C-suite leaders believe their training functions are delivering on the fundamentals that drive their businesses. </p>
<p>Many of the key outputs of HR need 21st century solutions/perspectives/processes&#8230;instead my observation is that we (that includes me) dress up the standard HR 20th century solutions with technology so it has a 21st century &#8220;flavor&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looks Like Training&#8230;Not! at Amitai Givertz&#8217;s Recruitomatic Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.hrexaminer.com/looks-like-training/comment-page-1#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Looks Like Training&#8230;Not! at Amitai Givertz&#8217;s Recruitomatic Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 11:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrexaminer.com/?p=2714#comment-232</guid>
		<description>[...] In reply to John Sullivan&#8217;s recent come-to-Jesus diatribe, Five Ugly Numbers That You Can’t Ignore – It’s Time to Calculate Hiring Failures on ERE.net, John Sumser now asks on HR Examiner: &#8220;Why not give the whole problem over to the training folks?&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In reply to John Sullivan&#8217;s recent come-to-Jesus diatribe, Five Ugly Numbers That You Can’t Ignore – It’s Time to Calculate Hiring Failures on ERE.net, John Sumser now asks on HR Examiner: &#8220;Why not give the whole problem over to the training folks?&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

