Retention?

On February 24, 2012, in HRExaminer, by John Sumser

Retention? - HR Examiner by John Sumser

In the 21st Century, loyalty is a choice, not an obligation of the employment contract.

When we think of retention, we think of water. The next time someone mentions having a retention problem, ask “Are you bloated?”

It’s a very bad name for a very good idea. The very word retention makes it seem like the organization is the sole actor in resolving the problem of “getting the right people to continue to work at our organization”. The company retains or it doesn’t. The employees are the passive recipients of retention programs.

Even in the current murky environment, employees decide to stay or leave. As long as the cause for termination isn’t downsizing, performance or some other business reason, the employee has at least an equal part in the decision to remain. As the unemployment rate falls, their share in that decision grows.

Although there are certainly a small number of employers who cling to the idea that the relationship is one-sided, most real players acknowledge the change that has happened in the firm’s relationship with its members. In the 21st Century, loyalty is a choice, not an obligation of the employment contract.

We think a better term would be “engagement”. The goal of effective ‘retention programs’ is to improve the bond between employees and the firm; to increase the likelihood that they will stay; to decrease the likelihood that they might leave.

In order to accomplish these objective, the company has to perform several tasks:

  • demonstrate the alignment between individual goals and organizational success;
  • create a motivational environment that rewards the investment of passion and focus from employees;
  • make the benefit of staying higher than the cost of leaving;
  • show the employee how to increase the value of their contribution;
  • accept and reward passion and commitment when they are demonstrated.It’s surprising how little of the efforts described as “Retention” focus on the actual work that people do. An “Engagement” Program would start at the level of the actual work and improve the organization by making workers more effective. Hassle reduction and the introduction of useful tools into the environment are the essential keys to success.
 
  • http://www.starktalent.com/ Doug Douglas

    John, just completed some research for a presentation that I’m soon to deliver that focuses on the next generation (Millenials, Generation Y, Net Geners) to follow the Baby Boomers and the shift that will be needed in business processes and policies to be able to retain them. The way companies accomplish their business in the next 10 years will look far different than what it is currently.

    My company also focuses on an individual’s motivators/drivers BEFORE the hire is made to see how it lines up with the company’s culture and values. By doing this, we have seen dramatic decreases in turnover in traditionally high turnover roles (from a national average of 50% to less than 10%).

    I’m convinced that many companies hide their heads in the sand and not look at the increased productivity and decreased recruiting costs that are possible by investing more time and effort in the retention of current employees.

    Doug Douglas
    National Engagement Manager at Stark

  • Pingback: HRExaminer v3.09 | HR Examiner with John Sumser

Page 1 of 11
More in HRExaminer (313 of 819 articles)