Review: HireVue

On March 29, 2010, in Reviews, by John Sumser

hirevue-300pxReview: HireVue

Today, I conducted yet another interview on Skype. I routinely use videoconferencing in either Skype or Google to do business outside of domestic American borders. Like many technical things, the rest of the world is fairly well ahead of the US in communications technologies.

It happened while we weren’t looking. While there is sure to be a real mobile boom, with all sorts of interesting recruitment advertising schemes, it will be while the US catches up to the rest of the world where mobile advertising is mainstream. The same holds true with video communications (unless you are a Mac user). The rest of the world is quickly grabbing on to trans-global video communications. The range runs from Cisco’s astonishing products to the more humble laptop based chat tools.

I have not been a fan of the idea that video interview companies were going to be able to add value in the HR marketplace for a sustained period. I’ve had more than one CEO hang up in frustration when I asked, “How is this different from having a telephone?” In most cases, it isn’t. Simple bandwidth offerings, posed as something else, will be early roadkill. Video calls will be as common as telephone calls in a couple of years. The technology is already good enough.

Last week, though, I had an amazing call with Mark Newman, CEO of HireVue. The company, which grew by 800% last year, is rooted in the delivery of pain reduction for the talent acquisition process. The flagship video interviewing tool is just a gateway to a company that makes hay reducing cycle time. I’ve been peppering him with the ‘video can’t be the only thing’ query for more than a year. But, I’d never seen the product up close.

First of all, it turns out that bandwidth and real time video conferencing are only about 15% of the company’s flow. The predominant use for video interviews is time shifting. That is, recruiters can generate qualifications driven hard core interviews for a group of candidates and review them all simultaneously. The HireVue software allows some pretty interesting things.

For instance, the interviews are segmented by question. That means that a recruiter can see all of the candidates respond to a single question rather than having to watch all of the interviews all of the way through. A knockout question that will disqualify some of the interviewees makes it possible to conduct full interviews while shortening the time it takes to reject a bad fit.

You can also consume the video data at 1.5x normal speed. On top of that, you can skim through the answers so, an hour of video (in what would have been an hour long interview) becomes a half an hour of video review. Talk about a productivity boost.

Videos are built into a workflow that allows the hiring team to comment on a question by question basis across the field of candidates. Rather than hours of sequential interviews in the office, candidates can be led through structured interviews with follow up.

Of course, HireVue has developed real logistics skill. The company can get a web cam into the hands of a candidate with extreme predictability. Their support team is powerfully good at installation.

Newman’s view is that the flood of data is going to overwhelm everyone in every job. He is positioning HireVue to be the hub for the interview process. We think that’s a smart place to set up shop.

Cutting huge chunks out of the time it takes to interview means that cycle time and costs can be cut while increasing quality. It’s the right direction for the industry. to be the hub for the interview process. We think that’s a smart place to set up shop.

Cutting huge chunks out of the time it takes to interview means that cycle time and costs can be cut while increasing quality. It’s the right direction for the industry.

 
  • lizzpellet

    Interesting perspective John and great to see you at ERE! My advice to companies looking to adopt this solution is to check with Legal before jumping on the prerecorded band wagon. Just takes one pissed off employee to post anyone's recorded interview on Youtube – or better yet have the candidate come back with a lawsuit against the hiring manager. Then you have to dig through the two years of video you have to (legally) store and defend the claim. But the legal angle is also my beef with Skype. If employers require a candidate to interview using Skype, they are essentially forcing that individual to give their personal information to a company that states right up front they might sell your information.

  • http://www.hrexaminer.com John Sumser

    You make a great case for using a vendor. Systematized storage and record keeping ought to be one of the big selling points for a system like this. Not using video seems like a luddite response. Using it wisely, by incorporating your concerns and suggestions, is a smart plan. Thanks, Liz.

  • Nschuler2k6

    Check out http://www.JobStem.com they are a much better online interviewing company

  • Pingback: HireVue » John Sumser Reviews HireVue on HRExaminer.com

  • http://twitter.com/gillian_donohoe Gillian Knight

    I can see the merit of this system. My concerns lie in cases where it is very difficult to separate 2-3 candidates for selection, which happens alot. The reasons for hiring one over the other could be very subjective and when you’ve video footage, this could leave employers more vulnerable against unfair selection cases.

    I also receive background feedback from candidates’ previous employers, contacts and other employees, who will not give a formal reference on record and the evidence given has been strong enough to discourage a hire. Alot of people receive payoffs and a good reference to leave their current role for misbehaviour/underperformance etc. This valuable real information becomes null and void if I use video interviewing as if the candidate interviews better than anyone else, I have no alternative but to hire.

  • Sarah

    Google & check out what the EEOC says about it. Summed up: People discriminate not technology.

    If a person being interviewed is going to be judge based on appearance or something similar that could be considered discriminating- it will happen- just later on during the 1st face-to-face interview.

    Also, you can still request the background information & base it off of that as well. Just because you interview, doesn’t mean you have to hire, but I would be careful of your tactic. If you don’t hire based on something background related, that has to be the same for all candidates across the board.

  • crazy american

    Sarah, do u work for hire vue?
    yes it is an awesome technology but just like any it has its own draw backs.

  • uteman10111

    I actually participated in an interview using the HireView system. I absolutely hated it. You’re looking at a computer screen, reading questions and looking at a video of yourself being recorded. It was very disconcerting, cold and bland. There is no visual or verbal feedback that you would normally get in a personal interview.

    I have a client who’s company has purchased the system and their hiring managers hate it. They say the length of the hiring process has tripled and their candidates are worse than before. The system has provided a crutch for the recruiting team in that they screen resumes and then just send links for the video interview. Then the hiring managers get a batch of videos to watch that haven’t been screened for anything more than what’s on a resume.

Page 1 of 11
More in Reviews (51 of 77 articles)