The Odds of Getting A Job With a Recruiter

On May 4, 2011, in HRExaminer, by John Sumser

recruiter-why-dont-you-call-hr-examiner“Many are called but few are chosen.”

The business of matching people with jobs is horribly flawed, loaded with waste and abuse and impossible to navigate. While you may have heard about headhunters actively recruiting people from their current assignments, it’s a relatively rare thing. Fewer than seven percent of the workforce is ever contacted by a recruiter.

The odds are one in 12 that a recruiter will contact you, on average. In reality, the odds are way worse than that for most people. Recruiters work in markets where there are shortages and/or high demand. Most people work in occupations where there is relatively low demand. If you remove the seven percent who actually get calls from headhunters, the likelihood becomes infinitesimally small.

But wait, it’s worse than that.

Most headhunters work on a pure performance-based commission structure for compensation. The very nature of their pay forces them to focus on the jobs and skills that are most in demand. Since there is no sustained cash flow, most recruiters work in operations where capital is in short supply. Cash is king in the recruiting business.

Contingency headhunters plow through an enormous number of connections and gate keepers in their search for a candidate who feels like the right (and salable) package. They take on more assignments than they can fill (closing one in eight or one in 10 deals is normal in the business)

In order to complete a single search, a recruiter may review as many as 300 resumes, culled from a variety of sources, none of them submitted by the candidates. That pile is sifted into a short list of approximately 10 resumes through a series of telephone calls and decisions. Those 10 people are heavily evaluated before being presented to the customer.

So, assuming that the headhunter you’re talking to closes 12% of the positions she tries to fill, the odds are:

  • 1 in 12 (8.5%) That a recruiter will ever call you
  • 1 in 30 (3.3%) that you will make it to the short list
  • 1 in 10 (10%) that you will be selected
  • 1 in 8 (12.5%) that she will fill the job she is talking to you about

In other words, the overall odds are about 1 in 28,520 (.0035%) that your conversation with a headhunter will land you a job.

You are better off buying scratch-off lottery tickets.

 

This article was originally published in Glassdoor’s Career Advice BlogHere are more of John Sumser’s career articles at Glassdoor.

 

 
  • Johnsumser

    If recruiters are so terrible, help me understand why its a $170B industry?!?
    http://www.hoovers.com/industry/staffing/1075-1.html

    Reality: recruiters find and fill critical client hiring needs that otherwise would go unfilled by internal HR, generating an opportunity for a client to be more profitable. If that weren’t the case, why would anyone ever engage a recruiter?

  • Bill

    This entire article sounds like sour grapes from someone who has never been “recruited” by a company who used a recruiter. If you take this advice, good luck accessing the really great jobs that are given to retained search firms. Any job seeker who doesn’t return calls from a quality recruiter is closing off an avenue that could be productive. Plus, the algorithm is totally erroneous.

  • Craig Silverman, Readyforce

    These are interesting numbers. Another interesting number is 15%, that the percentage of open jobs filled by recruiters. If you area job seeker looking for work with bills to pay then you should do everything you can to find employment and one of those things is to contract recruiters. Don’t wait for your phone to ring, make something happen. Traditional recruiting practices are a numbers game but there are some new technologies and processes being developed to disrupt the staffing industry so get Ready!

  • http://www.hrexaminer.com John Sumser

    Really good advice. Being proactive and targeted in your efforts is exactly
    the right thing to do.

    (A side note, can’t wait to hear about your project)

    John

  • Mike Ramer

    I respect Mr. Sumser’s perspective. He has interesting views and writes very well. However in this case, he has no idea what he is talking about. Why? Because he has never been a recruiter (that I know of). I have been recruiting for almost 20 years, run my own search firm and I am a trainer in the recruitment industry. Now, if I had an HR tech/vendor question, he’d be a good person to ask. As for recruiting and numbers, he is not an expert. I am happy to debate him on this topic at any industry event. Mr. Sumser, stick with what you know.

  • ex_mot_guy

     The flaw in your math is simple: you’re assuming a uniform distribution of candidates.  Top candidates are MORE likely to be called back, MORE likely to make it to he short list, MORE likely to be selected, and MORE likely to be the one that fills the job.  You need to be multiplying probability density functions, not probabilities.  If you’re, say, in the bottom quartile of all applicants calling a recruiter, your formula OVERESTIMATES your chances of success.

    I’m reminded of a joke told by a friend.  He says he knew a guy that landed a job through a great recruiter.  Over a short period, the guy advanced quickly toward the top of the company.  When asked how he was being so successful so quickly, he said it was simple.  Every time he got promoted, he gave his new boss’s name to the recruiter he’d used, and when his boss got another job, he moved up into his position.

  • http://www.hrexaminer.com John Sumser

    That’s funny. You’re right about the density question. What you say makes it
    even clearer that relying on the idea that a recyuter will get you a job is
    folly. You’ve a much better chance with the next lottery ticket.

  • Pingback: Human Resources Software

Page 1 of 11
More in HRExaminer (519 of 800 articles)